An Implicit Theories of Personality Intervention Reduces Adolescent Aggression in Response to Victimization and Exclusion
by David Scott Yeager, Kali H. Trzesniewski, and Carol S. Dweck
The hostile attribution bias is one of the most prominent constructs in the study of
aggression and in the field of developmental psychology. Whereas past research has
shown that hostile schemas and adverse experiences predict this bias, we propose that
seemingly neutral beliefs (implicit theories about the malleability of personality traits)
may also play a role in shaping it. Study 1 was a meta-analysis of eleven correlations
from eight original data sets (N = 1,659), and it showed that a fixed or entity theory about
personality traits predicted greater hostile attributional biases among high school
students, which mediated an effect on aggressive desires. Study 2 experimentally
changed adolescents’ implicit theories toward a malleable or incremental view of
personality traits and showed a reduction in hostile attributions. Study 3 was a brief
incremental theory intervention that reduced hostile intent attributions and aggressive
desires over an eight-month period. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
Real full draft article
No comments:
Post a Comment